syllabus
calendar
blackboard
student.email
resources
last.updated
8.15.07
|
|
Pedagogical
Analysis
Purpose
To promote
praxis, this assignment asks you to demonstrate your ability to apply
rhetorical theory to your understanding of the teaching of writing. Also
this assignment gives you practice at developing strategies that you need
to understand the writing pedagogies and policies you encounter.

Instructions–Epistemological
Process
Choose
an artifact or experience related to the teaching of composition or
professional writing (an acceptable alternative because scholars and
instructors in this discipline often use a rhetorical foundation; other
English Studies courses need to be approved by the instructor). Where
an artifact can be a textbook, a syllabus (pedagogical syllabus, not
policy syllabus), an assignment, a rubric, a pedagogical computer program,
or any other tool that supports the teaching of writing, an experience
can be the actual teaching of a class, a workshop, or any event in which
the teaching of writing occurs.
You are
encouraged to choose an artifact or experience related to the research
you are doing for the Conference
Paper, Roundtable, Article cycle of assignments. You are
also encouraged to analyze artifacts and experiences that you did not
produce; this will give you the opportunity to expand your understanding
of how practitioners use rhetoric to inform their work.
Instructions–Writing
Compose
a 1750-2500 word document that explains how rhetoric informs your chosen
artifact or experience. Minimally, you will need to...
- describe
the artifact or experience
- use
scholarship from rhetorical studies and composition studies to explain
the influences that informs the development of the artifact or experience
- suggest
possible revisions to the artifact or experience using scholarship
from rhetorical studies and composition studies to justify your decisions.
If ideas for revision do not immediately come to mind, consider how
the artifact or experience could be adapted to a specific context
You
are encouraged to add any other relevant material to these articulated
parameters.

Criteria
Logistics:
In addition
to the general evaluation
criteria, the instructor will be looking for evidence of...
- a sense
of audience–do you help your audience understand both the artifact
or experience you are analyzing, the scholarship you use to analyze
the text, and the connections you are making between the two?
- an informed
understanding of rhetorical studies and composition studies. Does your
inquiry demonstrate an understanding of the chosen artifact or experience
and its relevance to these other two disciplines?
- the ability
to use rhetoric and composition scholarship to re-envision the artifact
or experience
- an argument
about the artifact's or experience's rhetorical influence
- an ability
to engage in a meta-discourse about rhetorical theory and the teaching
of writing
- appropriate
use of conventions, including MLA, APA, or an appropriate citation formatting

|
|