Meagan Richard

Research Interests

My research examines “justice-centered school leadership,” a term I use to capture a merging of justice-centered approaches. Scholars have advanced several leadership approaches that center issues of justice, such as social justice (Theoharis, 2010; Wang, 2018; Wasonga, 2009), transformative (Shields, 2018), anti-racist (Irby, 2021; Santamaria and Santamaria, 2015), inclusive (DeMatthews and Mahwinney, 2014; Riehl, 2000), culturally-responsive (Khalifa, 2020; Khalifa et al., 2016), community/activist (Berkovich, 2014; Green, 2018; Khalifa, 2012), and indigenous, decolonizing (Khalifa et al., 2019) leadership. Each approach centers specific injustices (e.g., racism) and/or leadership modalities (e.g., activism), yet they also share commonalities and are not separated by distinct boundaries (Furman, 2012). Capper and Young (2014) argue that justice work is intersectional and complex, necessitating that school leaders work holistically across areas of difference rather than centering one aim. Similarly, McKenzie and colleagues (2008) argue that social justice takes on different meanings in different situations, demanding a nonessentialized conceptualization of leadership for justice. In line with these arguments, I conceptualize justice-centered leadership as encompassing the aforementioned leadership approaches and their respective practices, using a variety of modalities to contest numerous, intersectional forms of oppression.

I define justice-centered leadership as a form of leadership that acknowledges and rejects the status quo, in which schools reproduce social inequities and recognize that traditional education models threaten socially-just outcomes for students. To address this, justice-centered leaders seek to disrupt and rectify all forms of oppressive and marginalizing structures, policies, and practices within the school building. Additionally, these leaders contest oppressive structures outside of the school building because they understand that schools are not isolated from their community contexts. Crucially, these leaders are next-generation-oriented in that they seek to prepare students to actively engage as critical members of society.